If you have been following FC Cincinnati’s attempt to attain
a Major League Soccer expansion bid, then you know all about the argument
dealing with where to build FCC’s proposed soccer specific stadium and who
should pay for it. It is arguably the biggest sports story of the year as FCC’s
fate as a potential MLS expansion team could live and die on whether or not the
franchise can cement a stadium plan. In my opinion, the fact that MLS prefers
soccer specific stadiums is really stupid.
As far as I know, they are the only American professional
sports league that has a stadium requirement. Major League Baseball and the
National Football League have shared stadiums and the National Basketball
Association and the National Hockey League share arenas. I know for a fact that
some MLS teams have played in NFL stadiums. For example, Atlanta United FC
shares Mercedes-Benz Stadium with the Atlanta Falcons of the NFL and had over
70,000 fans in attendance for a match.
I realize that during the early days of MLS, teams often
played in very empty football stadiums which probably prompted MLS to prefer
soccer specific stadiums as they are smaller. What I do not think MLS has
realized is that the sport of soccer in America has grown. Kids all over the
country grow up playing it and both domestic and international matches are
shown on television pretty frequently. The world’s game has become a bonafide
American sport. So why would MLS want to hamper its rise by containing teams in
smaller stadiums?
As a diehard FC Cincinnati fan, I want the team to finalize
a soccer specific stadium plan and get an MLS bid. I don’t care how its funded
or where it’s built, just as long as a plan is in place and MLS commissioner
Don Garber names FC Cincinnati as an MLS expansion club. From a logical
standpoint though, I cannot help but think that the requirement of a soccer
specific stadium is outdated, does more harm than good, and is really stupid.
No comments:
Post a Comment